<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can&#8217;t trip over what&#8217;s not there&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remainingrelevant.net/remaining/170/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remainingrelevant.net/remaining/170</link>
	<description>Why stop dreaming when you wake up?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Remaining Relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you&#8217;re small, open data MIGHT be the point</title>
		<link>http://remainingrelevant.net/remaining/170#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Remaining Relevant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you&#8217;re small, open data MIGHT be the point</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/remainingrelevant/?p=170#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been reading, with interest, the conversations around the recent Mellon Award bestowed upon Casey Bisson and its possible implications for the landscape of bibliographic data. Tim&#8217;s been talking about it some, which is great. But the most substantive comment comes today from Dan Chudnov: First off, the LC bibliographic data is not exactly being held captive. Anybody can go buy a copy of this data now right from LC or from third parties today. The cost of this data is not in any way prohibitive for a medium- to large-scale institution that is already used to doing Big Deals in the six and seven figures. As I understand it many largeish library institutions *already* have access to the whole dataset and use it regularly for cataloging. I know this because I have a copy of some of it on one of my workstations, a copy I was allowed to use for research purposes. Granted, this came while I was working at Yale, but I assure you, Yale&#8217;s not the only place where this might be true. [Emphasis mine.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been reading, with interest, the conversations around the recent Mellon Award bestowed upon Casey Bisson and its possible implications for the landscape of bibliographic data. Tim&#8217;s been talking about it some, which is great. But the most substantive comment comes today from Dan Chudnov: First off, the LC bibliographic data is not exactly being held captive. Anybody can go buy a copy of this data now right from LC or from third parties today. The cost of this data is not in any way prohibitive for a medium- to large-scale institution that is already used to doing Big Deals in the six and seven figures. As I understand it many largeish library institutions *already* have access to the whole dataset and use it regularly for cataloging. I know this because I have a copy of some of it on one of my workstations, a copy I was allowed to use for research purposes. Granted, this came while I was working at Yale, but I assure you, Yale&#8217;s not the only place where this might be true. [Emphasis mine.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
