Palace or petting zoo?

2007 May 22

Snoozer

No one has ever accused my blog of being too cute, but I did return from Istanbul and filled out my family a bit.

The contrast, though, of visiting a place as strictly observer - even more pronounced by not speaking a word of Turkish - and then fully integrating a pair of babies into my house and life got me thinking.

I watch how libraries are discussed in the wild. I notice references on TV shows. I overhear conversations. And, yes, sometimes I ask people directly and my impression is that largely libraries are destinations, they’re artifacts. People talk about them as commodities. They are things and services that folks either see as valuable enough to invest time and energy in - leave the house, battle the OPAC, keep the kids quiet - or they don’t. If they don’t, well, they’re not library users.

What I see very rarely, although, admittedly more often lately, is libraries integrated into people’s lives in such a way that users don’t have to make an investment or go out of their way - or even think about it at all. The library is just there, where they need it. Participating in their life instead of the other way around.

1 Comment leave one →
2007 May 22

We have patrons who come in at the same time each and every week, like we’re a trap on their trapline, and they’re just routinely checking their traps. They come in the physical door. There are others who keep an eye on the digital door, making comments on the latest posts and updates, sending e-mails, asking questions. The digital patrons do not come into the library nearly as often. They are checking their digital traps: e-mail, rss feeds, bookmarked favorites, blogs, whatever. It is a great world in which we have both ways of building community through and in the library.

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS